i could have it backwards but im pretty sure that's what ive read over
there. you should check it out, some of the conversations they have over
there are pretty lettered.

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Jerald M Powell
wrote:

> I have two questions for Mr "glueit"... First, (unless there's been some
> kind of celestial shift), don't you have that backwards? and Second, have
> you seen a rush by trackies to get wired-on track tires (if there is there
> such a thing)?
> And one observation... The choice might depend on what the rims are that
> you have. On the road, the differences seem to be kind of academic. Cost
> for a similarly "durable" (OK, a twenty or thirty dollar tire/tube) or
> race-able tire (say, a tire combination that costs a bit over twice that) is
> similar, "tire life" is similar, and the trade off seems to be that the tub
> is harder to repair (and frequently is just discarded) but frankly, less
> often in need of repair.
>
> Jerry
>
> On Feb 28, 2008, at 11:46 AM, tackyglueit wrote:
>
> all the guys over on the wattage site say clinchers are the way to go.
> too much rolling resistance with a tubular.
>
> 2008/2/28 Rick Johnson :
>
> > Yea, even BikePortland is up to 104 comments on the helmet law.
> >
> > But, I'm interest in hearing more about tubulars - are they really worth
> > the money and hassle? So far I've not heard enough to convince me.
> >
> > Rick
> >
> > Bryan Curry wrote:
> >
> > No. I've seen 900+ messages on helmet usage within a single thread at
> > Google groups. OBRA members are slackin'.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > *From:* obra-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org]
> > *On Behalf Of *Mike Murray
> > *Sent:* Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:11 AM
> > *To:* 'OBRA List'
> > *Subject:* [OBRA Chat] Tubulars vs. clinchers
> >
> > We might be able to get as many postings with this subject. What do you
> > think?
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike Murray
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > *From:* obra-bounces@list.obra.org [mailto:obra-bounces@list.obra.org]
> > *On Behalf Of *C M
> > *Sent:* Thursday, February 28, 2008 08:08 AM
> > *To:* jon.ragsdale@comcast.net; OBRA List
> > *Subject:* Re: [OBRA Chat] Helmets will be mandatory in Vancouver, WA
> >
> > Jon....good job with the original posting, as of this morning I count 71
> > entries related to this topic, this may have set a record.
> >
> > On 2/26/08, jon.ragsdale@comcast.net wrote:
> > >
> > > There is a story on the front page of www.kgw.com reporting that
> > > Vancouver has enacted a rule that in 30 days all cyclists will be required
> > > to wear helmets. Full story:
> > > http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_022608_news_vancouver_helmet_law_bicycle.2edad9de.html
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OBRA mailing list
> > > obra@list.obra.org
> > > http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> > > Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
> > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OBRA mailing listobra@list.obra.orghttp://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> > Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OBRA mailing list
> > obra@list.obra.org
> > http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> > Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> OBRA mailing list
> obra@list.obra.org
> http://list.obra.org/mailman/listinfo/obra
> Unsubscribe: obra-unsubscribe@list.obra.org
>
>
>